Feature on Arundhati Roy

Feature on Arundhati Roy. From the i paper

“What makes you happiest – writing fiction or non-fiction?”, I ask Arundhati Roy who is on a flying visit to the UK where she has just given an exclusive reading from her forthcoming new novel The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, at a showcase in Soho hosted by her publisher, Penguin. There is no hesitation, no gap of twenty seconds let alone twenty years – the time it has been between publication of her 1997 Booker Prize-winning debut novel The God of Small Things and her new one – before she responds with a smile and, holding aloft a proof copy of her new novel so that the golden words of the title glint in the light, replies: “Fiction”. 

The thread of happiness and unhappiness is woven not only through the new novel but throughout the course of Roy’s life.  In the past twenty years Roy has been a prolific political writer and activist speaking out against injustices of poverty, inequality, nuclear weapons –  but has been imprisoned for her words, found guilty in India of ‘contempt of court’.  

Born in Shillong, India in 1961, Roy spoke movingly about her childhood on Desert Island Discs earlier this year – how her mother, a women’s rights activist, divorced her father, an alcoholic, but had nowhere to go so they lived for a time in her grandmother’s house (“Everybody used to tell us – why don’t you get out? This is not your house. You have no right to be here.  And so I’d spend all my time on the river…I grew up wild”).  Roy left home aged 17 and studied architecture before becoming a writer.  Her debut novel catapulted her into the literary spotlight when it won the Booker Prize and went on to sell 6 million copies and be published in 40 languages. 

Roy’s publisher, Simon Prosser, comments: “Like, I feel sure, most readers, I can still remember exactly where I first read it and how I felt while reading it”.  I vividly remember where I was when I first read The God of Small Things and how I felt while reading it – I was a teenager, curled up in my bedroom in Manchester, dreaming of one day making a living from words and becoming a writer.  That felt, though, like an impossible dream. I loved reading and devoured books from the local library but rarely saw myself represented in them – there were barely any brown people in the books I read.  The Booker Prize had been won by VS Naipaul, Salman Rushdie, Kazuo Ishiguro and Ben Okri but Roy was the first woman of colour to be awarded the prize at a time when it still felt that books were overwhelmingly the preserve of the ‘great white man of literature’.   Through the novel I was transported from my bedroom in Manchester to the riverbanks of Kerala. I knew my ancestors were from India but had not yet been. I experienced the power of literature to transport the reader and perhaps, I thought, I should not give up my writing dream after all.

When I hear Roy read from the new novel at the Showcase, the evocative writing again transports me. After the reading, Roy reflects on how “India is a place of so much diversity in so many religions, ethnicities, and so many languages – that’s how we live, in this cauldron of language. It is interesting writing from a space where there is not any one language. There isn’t any authentic language in which this book could have been written.”  She continues: “Those are big chauvinistic debates in countries like India now – what is authentic? Who is really Indian? Who is not? Who should be massacred and who should not?”.

Roy’s editor Simon Prosser, who has published much of Roy’s non-fiction and also edits Zadie Smith, Hari Kunzru and Robert Macfarlane, quizzes Roy after her reading, suggesting that the last twenty years of political essays, speeches, reportage have fed valuably into the novel. “Absolutely”, replies Roy. “With the political essays, they get me into so much trouble that each time I write one I swear to myself that I will never write another one…It’s five collections of essays that I never meant to write! But yes all of that understanding surely went towards writing this”. 

Roy reflects: “I think this book could not have been written any quicker or slower than it was. It’s also true that some stories are much greater than an accumulation of facts and can only be told in fiction”.  On topic of fiction versus non-fiction, she points out:  “As a political writer and an essayist I’m pretty straightforward about what I want to say but I’m the opposite when I write a novel – it’s not a manifesto, it’s not trying to give information or get people to think in a different way, it really is trying to understand the air, and trying to understand the heart”.

Roy speaks about her influential friendship with the late John Berger, who was instrumental in inspiring her to finish the novel: “John Berger is someone I loved and admired. Many years ago, in 2009 I think, I’d already been writing this book for ten years – not in some desperate way but it takes its own time – I was with him in his village and after dinner he said: ‘OK, open your computer and read me what you’ve been writing’.  He’s the only person in the world who could have made me do that. And I did.  There are parts of this book which have been unchanged for years – the opening paragraph is still the opening paragraph. And he said: ‘I want you to go back and I just want you to finish it. Don’t write anything else, just this’.  And I promised him I would.  He used to call me Utmost as he knew the title.”  What did you call him?, asks Prosser.  “I used to call him Jumbo – once I was upset about something and he said, ‘just imagine I am standing behind you like an old elephant or something, flapping my ears to cool you down’, and I said, ‘thanks, Jumbo’”.  

Roy returned to India determined to do nothing else but finish the novel – but was scuppered by a note slipped under her door. “The note was from the guerrillas in the forests in central India fighting against the big mining companies inviting me to go into the forest and spend some weeks with them, and they wouldn’t trust anyone else. I couldn’t say no – so I went”.  After coming out of the forest she wrote a powerful essay called Walking with the Comrades (“which of course got me into trouble”).  

On finally finishing the novel: “the first thing I did in September was to go to Paris with the manuscript and I gave it to John [Berger] and I think it was the last book he read before he went into the other room and I’m so grateful for that”. 

She is eager for the book to hit the bookstores before it can be banned or censored in India and recounts the ordeals she has been through, such as being “charged with sedition”. She continues: “I do want to say that I’m pretty worried about the situation in India right now”.  She recalls the hostility she has faced: “If I’m supposed to speak somewhere these gangs of storm troopers gather, saying ‘Arundhati Roy is a traitor!’ And stupid stuff.”.  She describes the situation as being “like trip-wires”, the sense of “constant harassment”, and how “they stone and smash the stage when you speak, they threaten you…it just goes on and on and on”. 

Roy speaks of the need to stand firm in the face of false assumptions and to create a psychological space for writing fiction where such negative voices are absent: “I eventually realised that if I was allowing that voice in my head I would not have written anything. So I told myself, OK write it the way you want to write it – exorcise that voice from your body and then keep the manuscript in a draw. Because you just go mad if you don’t write it. But of course once it’s done the writer’s ego does not allow it to be kept in the draw.”  The book is embargoed until 28th May but I can reveal that, having had an exclusive preview read, it’s of utmost happiness that it did not stay in Arundhati Roy’s draw – here is a book that needs to be in the world. 

The Ministry of Utmost Happiness is published by Hamish Hamilton on 6th June

-2.jpg

-3.jpg

From the Guardian

I interviewed the writer Edward Docx – published in The Guardian on Saturday 22nd April

Click here to read more

 

‘Now I never feel trapped by identity’

Interview with Edward Docx

When Edward Docx was 13 years old, his grandmother lay on her deathbed at the family home in Greater Manchester and made a startling revelation to his mother – she wasn’t who they thought she was.  

“The woman that my mum, Lila, called mum for all of her life was an Indian woman from Hyderabad – but as she lay dying, she told my mother that she wasn’t actually her mum, which obviously shocked my mum greatly.  My mum’s life turned upside down,” he explains.  She then revealed another bombshell to Lila: that her grandfather was in fact her father.  

The woman Docx knew as his grandmother, Manwar, nicknamed “Mano”, explained to Lila that her real mother had been a Russian chorus dancer – now dead – with whom Lila’s real father Ralph Partridge Snr had had a short relationship.  Ralph Partridge Snr gave the child born from the brief affair to his grown-up son by his first marriage, named Ralph Jnr, who was already married to Mano. They brought up Lila as their own.

Although Docx was in the house at the time of the revelations, they took place behind closed doors from him, and he only later found out the truth about who he was.  “I think basically mum kind of protected us all from it at the time so she could tell us in her own way”.  Rather than his mother sitting them all down to tell them, she waited to get confirmation of what Manwar had said via letters from her godmother.  “I became aware of her discussing it with my dad and then gradually me and my brothers and sisters discovering what she was discussing and why.  When my mum started a quest to get pictures of her real mum, we were fully aware of that”.  Did he ask a lot of questions? “I was really inquisitive and spent my young life trying to find things out about family and the wider world”. 

The Partridges were a military family, officers in the British Army, and the man Lila thought of as her father was called “Military Grandad” by the seven Docx siblings.  “My mum grew up thinking Military Grandad and Mano were her mum and dad – that was how it was.  Military Grandad at the end of his life abandoned Mano and they became estranged. When I was a little boy I’d go and visit them both as grandparents but gradually Military Grandad was just not there when we visited and then our mother told us he was dead.” 

Why did Lila’s father style himself in the role of grandfather and give away his child?  “Her real father lied because he had an affair and Lila was the child of that affair – simple as that.  But he also took responsibility in a way by making sure that my mother was brought up well and went to university – my mother had a really good education as a biochemist which was paid for by her real father.  That created loads of weird cross-currents and semi-dysfunctional relationships.” 

When Manwar died, did she take more secrets with her to the grave? Was there a lot left unanswered? “Yes, lots of things remain unclear and me and my brothers and sisters talk about it all the time to this day. I would have loved to have talked to her about all this – for me, I wasn’t on the front line of it like my mum so there’s a lot of questions left unanswered about their lives”. 

The woman who Docx thought of as his grandmother died and was buried in England. “It was a long journey for her as she was born in Hyderabad, the 13th child of a Brahmin family. She left her family for Ralph Partridge Jnr without their blessing and when she married him, she was cut off by her family”.

He pauses. “So that was who I thought was my grandmother…”

The gulf between who we think we are and who we turn out to be was at the heart of his Man Booker Prize longlisted novel Self-Help and is a subject in his powerful new book, Let Go My Hand.  “My mum thought she was half-Indian and that was my inheritance until I was 13.  It raises a very interesting question about nature versus nurture.  Whatever the truth of my DNA I had a major cultural reversal.  Presumably my DNA is a quarter Russian.  But I didn’t think that at all.  I thought I was a quarter Indian and loved being a quarter Indian and dreamt of going to India when I was growing up and finding my grandma’s house and even going to see her relatives and saying I know you fell out, but here I am.  So I got to the age of 13 thinking all these things…”  The discovery changed their sense of narrative about who they were. 

How did the family deal with having their identity so suddenly rocked to the core?  “Looking back, my Mum handled it with an exuberance – she started dressing in long Russian dresses and bought all these Russian icons and put them all over the house, and bought maps of the Soviet Union, and we had to listen to endless romantic Russian composers.  She became a classical music agent and started inviting musicians to stay and had concerts in the front room – Mussorgsky, Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky and would serve syrupy Russian pancakes – blini”.  She also searched for traces of her real mother, scouring libraries for any references or photographs of her.  “She embraced her Russian heritage.  And I sort of embraced it because my Mum did. I started to go to Russia to learn more. I read all of the Russians – Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Turgenev, Bulgarkov – long before I could really understand them.  I realise now I did that in boyish support of my mum”.  

The oldest of seven children Docx grew up in an “eccentric, bohemian” family who lived in a ramshackle house, “slightly on the edge but never quite – no carpets, no curtains, ragged furniture, pre-historic plumbing, every thing threadbare and ancient and cobwebbed and broken-down. You don’t realise as a kid what’s going on but later in life you look back and realise wow that was quite odd”.  The eccentricity extended to family holidays:  “Because there was seven children, we couldn’t fly anywhere, that was out of the question – so we had these absolutely insane ragamuffin holidays in which they’d drive us for four weeks all over Europe camping and sleeping by rivers and lakes”.  They visited places where composers were born or died, and cathedrals and caves and concerts. Or they’d drive madly to see a Formal 1 race in, say, Holland or Germany – and sleep beside the track. “And my mum was also trying to educate us about the disasters of when democracy goes wrong, and we’d go to concentration camps like Dachau”.

Now a father of four himself, Docx has long challenged concepts of what constitutes a ‘normal family’.  The discovery of long buried secret identities in his family initially made him question everything but he is now at peace with it. “A lot of people feel trapped in an identity.  When I thought my mum was part-Indian and she was actually part-Russian, it made me feel less hidebound or delineated. A surprising number of writers sit obliquely to the cultures that they write about”.  Was it ultimately liberating, I wonder?  “Totally – now I never feel trapped by identity”. 

Lila has also found peace: “My mother has stopped her questing and settled into a happy retirement with my father. They drive around Europe  all year attending the concerts of their friends and visiting vineyards and places of historical interest. They’re seldom home now.”

Docx has been aware of the power of stories from an early age – both those that we are told and those that we tell ourselves.  Manwar was a great storyteller. “I used to sit with her when I was little, aged 6, 7, 8, 9, and listen to stories of India – amazing stories of running away from tigers and being bitten by a snake and her childhood way back in the 20s and 30s – incredibly rich and exciting stories. I would listen to her for hours. I don’t even know if she made them up, I have no idea.”  Manwar’s most powerful legacy was perhaps her stories – and how they went on to form the fertile imagination of someone who, for a living, now writes captivating stories about families. 

Let Go My Hand is published by Picador, £16.99

Photo credit: Charlie Carter